<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Glenn Beck - Latest Comments in Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://glennbeck.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://glennbeck.disqus.com/santorum_sweeps_three_states_in_pursuit_of_gop_nomination/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:15:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-438971616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish I could convince you that Ron cares about the world. You can plainly see that Europe is on the verge of collapse, and we will follow. This is why Ron talks of free markets and free and fair trade. Take Iran for example; I lived there for 18 months, from 1976 to 1979. The people are kind, polite and want the same things we want; a job, a home and a family. They loved Americans and The American Way, and we were treated like royalty over there, Since the 50s, we have been tampering with thier government, propping up dictators, and when we decide we don't like the current dictator that we chose, we 'help' overthrow that one, and replace him with another dictator, NOT DEMOCRACY. After decades of bad decisions about Iran on our part, and decades of trade embargos and boycots, we may have upset enough regular Iranian citizens to cause them to resent us and actually take action against us. Now that we have upset the 'ordinary' guy in the middle east (as we do this in almost every middle eastern country), we get attacked occasionally in Europe and at home. This is what Ron talks about.  The United States does not worry about defending the defenseless, we worry about defending oil. Yes, I'll admit that when mass genecide occures, we sometimes come to the defense of the people who are being wiped out, but it is mostly self-interest we defend around the world.  Finally, has your Mother ever told you "you can catch more flies with honey than vinegar." She wasn't lying to you. That is precisely why Ron believes free trade is better than nation building. He also believes that war should be approved by congress as outlined in the Constitution.   Take Israel for example, they have a threat from Iran. They want to unilaterally attack Iran with the second most powerful airforce (second only to ours) and WE PAID FOR IT. For some reason, we are trying to dictate to our ally that they must only attack Iran under our terms. Allies should not be dictated to, they should be helped by us only when we are asked to get involved by them. Now we are starting to upset Israel. See how that works? If we want to characterize free trade, following the Constitution, and NOT tampering with every small countrys' government that we can, in order to get what we can, as a wild west mentality, that I guess i'm 'old' too. Too old to embrace 'the new world order'. This is for you Paige, in case you missed it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">freebird52164</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:15:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-438969154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, by the way, you are wrong about people of the world resenting our freedom. They resent the dictators WE put in power over them, and they wonder why freedom is good for America, yet they are expected to settle for less. You need to read history to get the facts&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">freebird52164</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:13:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-438962216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish I could convince you that Ron cares about the world. You can plainly see that Europe is on the verge of collapse, and we will follow. This is why Ron talks of free markets and free and fair trade. Take Iran for example; I lived there for 18 months, from 1976 to 1979. The people are kind, polite and want the same things we want; a job, a home and a family. They loved Americans and The American Way, and we were treated like royalty over there, Since the 50s, we have been tampering with thier government, propping up dictators, and when we decide we don't like the current dictator that we chose, we 'help' overthrow that one, and replace him with another dictator, NOT DEMOCRACY. After decades of bad decisions about Iran on our part, and decades of trade embargos and boycots, we may have upset enough regular Iranian citizens to cause them to resent us and actually take action against us. Now that we have upset the 'ordinary' guy in the middle east (as we do this in almost every middle eastern country), we get attacked occasionally in Europe and at home. This is what Ron talks about.&lt;br&gt;  The United States does not worry about defending the defenseless, we worry about defending oil. Yes, I'll admit that when mass genecide occures, we sometimes come to the defense of the people who are being wiped out, but it is mostly self-interest we defend around the world.&lt;br&gt;  Finally, has your Mother ever told you "you can catch more flies with honey than vinegar." She wasn't lying to you. That is precisely why Ron believes free trade is better than nation building. He also believes that war should be approved by congress as outlined in the Constitution. &lt;br&gt;  Take Israel for example, they have a threat from Iran. They want to unilaterally attack Iran with the second most powerful airforce (second only to ours) and WE PAID FOR IT. For some reason, we are trying to dictate to our ally that they must only attack Iran under our terms. Allies should not be dictated to, they should be helped by us only when we are asked to get involved by them. Now we are starting to upset Israel. See how that works? If we want to characterize free trade, following the Constitution, and NOT tampering with every small countrys' government that we can, in order to get what we can, as a wild west mentality, that I guess i'm 'old' too. Too old to embrace 'the new world order'. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">freebird52164</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-436929385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your would be taken seriously if you didn't have so many misspellings which insinuate that you are uneducated. I am not trying to be ugly but seriously, read your post before hitting the send button. &lt;br&gt;Ex: waist should be waste, redoric should be rhetoric, Libertys should be liberties, not capitalized either. na sayers should be nay sayers, sourse should be source, expensise should be expense, canidate should be candidate, Santoram should be Santorum and Democrates should be Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bunnywithpancakeonhead</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:49:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-436925273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this were Ron Paul's true attitude that stance would be understandable. But from my understanding and prove me wrong if I am, with facts, Ron Paul just doesn't care about the world and thinks he can be an isolationist country while everyone else will say "Hey, the USA doesnt' want to get involved, let's let them be". The truth is we are the most hated country in the world because of our freedoms, that threaten their stranglehold on their own countries, their oppression of their people is threatened because the world sees the US treating their people with dignity and rights, and so the only answer in their crazy power mad heads is to destroy America. We cannot live in peace while the world is destroying people who's only crime is to be born of a lower caste, different race or belief in a different god. We have an obligation as the strongest country in the world to protect those who cannot protect themselves, and we are morally and by the sovereign God commanded to defend the defenseless. Minding our own business is not an option. Besides, it will become our business when they decide we are too weak to defend ourselves. Ron Paul has dangerous foreign policies, he is too old and living in a vision of yesterday's Wild West mentality. He may have some domestic economic policies that I wholeheartedly agree with, but his stance on foreign policy has lost my vote and countless others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bunnywithpancakeonhead</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-436275009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think santorum could lead this country he could debate against  Obama and probably win.  santorum sounds like he could be a leader of a big country.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattzweck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:18:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-435351605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe you're right.  Because the way it is now is so wrong.  I respect your answer and see truth in it.  Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-435291973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I donot think this ( Healthcare law ) has  to do with women health  it has to do with I known what is best for you and they are going to use  the muslim religion  to make their point  Watch he will start or his little friends will start saying but look at how you will not let the crazy off the chart muslim so call religion  and now when it is your religion you bitch. I started hearing it to day  I am talking about the  one who think it is ok to kill or beat their women  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamaw011645</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-435282126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Flavor of the day. Didn't Mitt just 'sweep' the last two states by a 'landslide'? It means nothing! They're all just Republican Progressives, like George Bush. Ron Paul is the only real alternative. Ron Paul 2012!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">freebird52164</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:53:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-435262491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand your fear, unfortunately so do the people who love war. Ron understands that we have spent ourselves into deep debt to 'protect our interests' overseas. We have also upset people whos countries we occupy. Imagine if the Chinese had a military base with 40,000 troops in Cuba or Canada, or God forbid, on our soil. We would not like it because it threatens our sovernty. Ron just wants wars to be approved by Congress like the Constitution dictates, it's scary, but its the law that we have ignored. The hypocracy is being for war in all corners of the earth, and not being able to afford it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">freebird52164</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:27:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434829639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, LA County passed legislation that prohibits the throwing of footballs or frisbies on the beaches. (No, i'm not kidding)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part 1.&lt;br&gt;Who would you trust the most to stand on their own hind legs and loudly speak out persistently and strongly against such an infringement of individual rights?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A. Rick Santorum&lt;br&gt;B. Mitt Romney&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part 2.&lt;br&gt;Give me an example of the person of your choice, standing on their own hind legs and speaking out against the disgust of liberalism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Your input could be an educational experience for both of us, so take it seriously. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">the_publius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434827066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Disagree with you on Romney and Santorum. Actually one of O's greatest supporters are the unions. Santorum supported the unions over right to work. Santorum supports earmarks...as does O. Santorum was also big government. Newt has a video from May 2010 showing Santorum strongly opposing the Tea Party. Romney won in florida among all groups, conservative, tea party. women...&lt;br&gt;Listen to Romney's speech at CPAC on Friday.  Would love to be there!!!!!&lt;br&gt;Beat Obama!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dianequestions</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:06:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434815962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...So, just how did Santorum "compromise his principles"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(With sources, please)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">the_publius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434815401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why? You have obviously been convinced of unthruths.&lt;br&gt;Defeat Obama!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dianequestions</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434812381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mass is a Dem state but Romney fought against a 85% dem legislature and did not compromise his principles as did Santorum. See where it got San..he lost reelection.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dianequestions</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434812294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Boy howdy, ...Amen!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">the_publius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434530690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have read that Rickey voted on a lot of earmarks, he voted for many gov. programs, he wants to put a cap on medical malpractice, which is ok with me, but he doesn't practice what he preaches, when his wife was injured by a Chriopractor, they sued for a very large sum. I have seen a video put out by Ron Paul that Santorum is a lobbyist and voted for many programs not conservative.  When did Santorum become your candidate?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pogerm1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434520364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;however....I would vote for navel lint over Obama. This is one time it wouldn't matter who is running.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">probuiltenterprises</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434518391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;arguing with a liberal or moron is like chasing your tail. Just makes you dizzy, hurts like hell when and if you catch it and gets you know where fast. Now I have to go back to work to pay for 1/3 of the population that is dependant on my taxes . ;)  SANTORUM IS MY CHOICE ....don't give a dam about your choices&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">probuiltenterprises</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434509082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;kinabru....it's so obvious you never looked into Rick's record or accomplishments. Too bad.... uninformed voters are the reason we are where we are &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">probuiltenterprises</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:04:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434502328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are just arugmentative, I guess you would have had to say that Reagan was a RINO, he was a dem. before he became a republican.  You are probably a anti Romney Plant, go away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pogerm1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:56:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434489908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just for you little man:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For today, and every day you post here, I will post your lies on every comment you make on this site.... Your hate and ignorance is not winning any converts here. You're the butt of jokes and ridicule.Please see a professional about your fixation on little children strtlk/mtclayboy.You've been caught in your lies and have no credibility here. You're a Wikipedia sailor and a lying puke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. As mtclayboy you claimed that you served on a BOOMER. As strtlk you claimed not to know what a Boomer or a SSBN was "I don't care" were your exact words. You also stated that you didn't know where Bangor, Wa. was which is where Boomers (submarines) are fitted for duty.Any real Submariner would know that. You didn't!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. You then changed your story and claimed that you were on a BOOMER. You lied.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. As mtclayboy you claimed that you had damaged your ears while serving on a Submarine. As strtlk, you claimed that you damaged your ears while serving on a submarine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. As mtclayboy you claimed that you joined the Navy and served for five years on a submarine but according to the timeline you gave that was proven to be a lie. You lied.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. As mtclayboy you said that you were a Fireman. As strtlk, you claimed you were a Fireman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. As mtclayboy and as strtlk, you posted the same bigotry and hate against Glenn Beck almost word for word even using the same spelling and grammatical errors and focusing on the children. I've posted many of them here already.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are you catching on everyone? He's a liar plain and simple and nothing he claims can be believed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take your bigotry and hate and Phony Soldier ID and leave us honest people alone?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Flag the idiot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434489312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cute icon...A dead give away that you like it from behind...just like your favorite team...the LA Sissies on Ice!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">strtlk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434481195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The shuttle has already been scrapped. Go to &lt;a href="http://virgingalactic.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="virgingalactic.com"&gt;virgingalactic.com&lt;/a&gt; and check out what they have already done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am all for cutting and slashing the federal budget, especially the entitlements. I just think we should do both at the same time. I don't like the thought of China having the upper hand on us. I also don't like us having to hitch rides with the Russians. They are not our allies, just like China isn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum sweeps three states in pursuit of GOP nomination</title><link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/02/08/santorum-sweeps-three-states-in-pursuit-of-gop-nomination/#comment-434454951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Granted on the surface Santoram seems like a better canidate then Romney and Gingrich, but they are all from the same stable controlled by the Globalist bankers. All three will bow down to the demands of the Globalists.There is no difference between Republicans and Democrates when you look behind the curtain. You are all waisting your time arguing about the differences  between your canidates. Don't buy into all this redoric about Iran, It is just a power grab by the globalists at the expenise of Americas resources and our beloved troops. We need people in the Goverment who want to End the Federal Reserve and restore our Libertys. America and the world is facing the point of no return if we do not defeat the globalists bankers. For all you na sayers. You have been warned! I beg you to turn of the state controlled media and seek out alternate sourse of information like this site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">c2697h</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:03:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>